There has been over 1000 sightings of bigfoot dating back to 1784 just in North America. The first sighting was in Lake of the Woods, Manitoba. In 1884 there was a bigfoot captured and his captures called him Jacko. He was a baby bigfoot, mysteriously Jacko disappeared on his way to London. Albert Ostman ssaid he was attacked by this creature in Vancouver. The creature "Yeti" carried him over the mountains into the yeti's den where Ostman saw the yeti family. In the 80's and 90's there were three sighting of the same bigfoot in Wahshington. First a boy near a creek saw the monster and he siad it was over 6' tall and it had a pot belly and blue eyes. He also said that the monster had limp on his right leg. The yeti was spooted again in 1995 by a father and son who were camping. Again the two said the yeti walked with a limp on his right leg. In 1996 a man chainsawing in Washington said he saw a white yeti with a pronounced right limb just like the other two eyewitnesses said.
Now on to the matter of the footprints. The foot a a bigfoot are from 14-18" long and 5-9" in width and are always deeper than a man foot. Many scientists think that the bigfoot prints can not be a hoax because the ankle of these prints was positioned father forward than the ankles of a man. "No hoaxer could have figured out just how far forward to shift the ankle for a biped of the indicated size." Scientist Grover Krantz.
http://www.rfthomas.clara.net/bf_prints.htmlhttp://www.rfthomas.clara.net/bf_sightings.html
October 19 2005, 04:05:18 UTC 6 years ago
Just one question..."bloodshot blue"? What does that even mean.
75/75